Notice to
referees
General Considerations:
Your assessment is particularly important with regard
to scientific soundness. If you advise the editor that the paper
is not acceptable it will not be published without further review.
Your advice on other
aspects is also requested. These aspects are more of a subjective
nature. Your point of view should therefore be justified. Dynamics at the Horsetooth does not request the material to be new.
However,
plagiarism is not allowed and we would like you to make sure that
the paper does not contain extended parts of published materials
and that the relevant sources are correctly cited.
Validity
Is the work scientifically correct? If it is not the
case, do you believe the paper can be revised?
Importance
Does the paper contain substantial research or well-presented
work (in the form of a review).
Interest
Is this paper of general interest in nonlinear science? Why do
you think this paper should be published in The Nonlinear Journal?
Appearance
In some cases, the appearance of the paper can be enhanced by
proper stylistic revision.
We welcome all suggestions along the following questions:
Is the introduction clear and well-presented?
Does it address the basic issues relevant to the problem?
Is the research properly placed into context (e.g. are the references
adequately discussed)?
Is unnecessary jargon avoided?
Are the ideas well exposed?
Are the abstract and title sufficient to understand the content
of the paper?
Does the conclusion open the research field to new ideas?
|